UniLad: Where rape and misogyny are laughing matters

There was a pleasant time when I had no knowledge of UniLad. Then, over a short period, it kept appearing in my Facebook news feed where friends had either commented or ‘liked’ pictures and articles. Some of these were harmless. Some were a little funny. I mean, a covered toilet with a small hole saying expert level is a bit funny. Seeing an imperial storm trooper on the side of a UK motorway tickled me. But then it started to change. Photos of young women passed out through alcohol with the legs spread, became a common ‘like’ among some people. Not only is the legality of the photos questionable, but what about the message?

Well, you don’t need to think too hard because UniLad write articles to let you know what their message is. One article ‘guiding’ readers through what to do on a one-night stand said “If she’s not putting out…” only 15% of rape cases are reported, concluding that they were good odds you will get away with it.

I wouldn’t go as far to suggest that the majority writers or the readers of UniLad actively endorse rape, but what climate does an article like that create. Well again, UniLad’s Facebook group enlightens us further. After the above comment received press attention, countless people posted on the Facebook group to show their disgust. The regular readers were defensive as you would guess. One was so adamant that people were wrong about UniLad, he threatened to rape and murder a woman who posted on the discussion.

Welcome to the world of ‘banter’. That’s what the readers of UniLad called it. ‘Banter’ is little more than illness infecting our campuses, where rape, misogyny, sexuality and race are all ripe for laughter. Comedians have made careers from it, but the fact is, the writers of UniLad and the morons that partake in it are not comedians.

The founder of UniLad now faces disciplinary from his University and the site has been taken down for a month for a ‘rebrand’, but this doesn’t mean a thing. UniLad was just ‘banter’ in it’s most accessible form. This style of ‘humour’ has infected our campuses and unions.

Pugwash News featured an article last year about how the Waterhole was not accessable to women. While there may not be nights designed for women, it highlighted other points worth considering. The sexist jokes, the sexual comments, and discussions of often racist and homophibic manner mean that if you are a little bit different, meaning different from the 50% that are straight and male, the Waterhole may not always be pleasant.

More often, the victims are female. Make a lurid comment on their bodies and if they don’t like it, it’s only a bit of banter, love. Grope them at the bar, you got it, banter again.

But the victims aren’t always female. Last month, an AU tour featured a Nazi-themed drinking game. Holocaust jokes and hailing the fuhrer are all part of the fun. When a Jewish student didn’t accept the defence it was just banter, his nose was broken. No matter who the victim is, if they are not enjoying it, it is deemed to be their issue.

The fact is, it isn’t. Jokes about rape, race, sexuality etc are not funny, especially when they leave the mouth of an arrogant, middle class, white male. This isn’t a rant against fun and humour, its a rant against misogyny, homophobia and racism thinly-veiled as humour. Some comedians get away with making generalisations about groups because they are clever, and the butt of the joke isn’t the group itself. With ‘banter’, the butt of the joke is those most maligned in society and if they laugh it does not always mean it is fine. Because UniLad had one female writer the ‘UniLadette’, does it make jokes about rape fine? It does not.

UniLad’s site going down is a minor victory, but it will not be the end. ‘Banter’ needs to be destroyed alongside every other disgusting, bigoted part of society.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Students

No cuts to Eldon question University of Portsmouth VC

 

Today, Students from University of Portsmouth interrupted a photo-op by vice-chancellor John Craven and CCi Dean Simon Claridge.

The photo-op was to celebrate the start of building the final wing of the Eldon Building, where art is taught mainly.

The students response was planned quickly, with members of Occupy Portsmouth coming to support at short notice.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Anti-Cuts

University of East Anglia clamp down on free speech

This email was sent to students yesterday;

A message to all UEA students from the Registrar and Secretary:

Facebook and other social media provide a wide range of valuable opportunities for you to find out about facilities available to you at UEA, enhance your learning through the exchange of ideas and views, c…omment on your UEA experiences and keep in touch with friends. However, you need to be aware that anything you post (however innocently intended) on your own blog, web page or on Facebook or similar sites, may, if it includes, for example, ill-judged views, inaccurate information, or personal remarks directed against others, be seen as potentially defamatory or libellous.

Any statement you publish may be legally actionable. Even comments which simply contain factual inaccuracies can potentially cause loss or damage to individuals or jeopardise their safety. You may be personally liable for the consequences.

You also need to remember that you remain subject to the University’s regulations covering acceptable standards of behaviour, the proper use of IT facilities, and harassment and bullying. In the event of a serious breach of these regulations, on Facebook or elsewhere, the University will not hesitate to take action which could lead amongst other things to withdrawal of your IT access, and to a fine or suspension (or even in the most extreme case to expulsion) under the University’s Code of Discipline for Students.

So, do think carefully before posting comments about others.

Brian Summers
Registrar and Secretary
UEA

Activists are claiming this is an attempt to stop them organising their anti-cuts campaign on campus through social media. When Universities are deliberately not giving out information in regard to their planned cuts, this is quite worrying.

While the attacks on free speech are not as bad as University of Birmingham, where protests have been banned on campus for a year, a move denounced by Amnesty International, it shows that Universities are increasingly willing to use draconian measures to clamp down on dissent.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Students

Portsmouth Student Union: Now a fascist-free zone

After two years of campaigning by various groups on campus, Portsmouth Student Union finally passed a ‘No Platform Policy’ in last night’s Student Council.

The motion, which was proposed by Education and Democracy Sabbatical Officer Godfrey Atuahene Jnr, passed almost unanimously but the debate preceding the vote was heated. The motion can be read here.

The arguments against the motion were what anyone would expect. Some argued that we must debate with fascism. Some argued that we should not pass a motion that would mean fascist/racist students are not allowed on union grounds. Student Union President Amy Baker argued the latter the most.

My personal view on these arguments are thus; You cannot debate fascism. Those that think we can have obviously never tried. There may be some supporters of the BNP/EDL/BFP etc that you may be able to sway with some arguments, however, these sort of ‘soft’ fascists are not the ones likely to be invited to speak at any event. After Nick Griffin’s appearance on Question Time, the BNP received 3,000 enquiries about membership (you couldn’t technically join at the time, as a court ruling was in place until they started to accepted non-white people). And besides, the motion never said that people could not debate fascists, simply they could not do it on Union grounds.

As for the last argument, I do not care if by barring fascist students is against ‘our mission statement’. The Student Union is a safe place for students from all forms of hatred and if a student who hates others because of their skin colour, sexuality, gender etc cannot come in and take part in activities in the Union, who cares? Their right is void the second they argue for the elimination of other people’s rights to exist.

The motion also resolved that the Union would mobilise for counter-demos against far-right groups. This is excellent and I hope the Union does it, if not, there are a number of students who will. The Union did not mobilise or promote the counter-demo when the EDL marched in Portsmouth, next time, it will be different.

The motion is a positive step and a long time coming. It is a joke that after several protests by the EDL in Portsmouth and instances of them coming onto union grounds to attack and harass students, this policy wasn’t passed earlier.

This motion will not beat fascism, but it is a start.

 

 

1 Comment

Filed under Fascism, Racism, Students

A look back at a year of activism in Portsmouth: Students

Students protest over art cuts and course closures

 
As worker’s struggle reignited, the student movement left the forefront of dissent in Britain. However, students didn’t simply go back to drinking and watching Countdown (or whatever other cliché you want to throw at students).
 
Before I go into the last year of activism, I want to explain a bit of what Portsmouth University was like politically when I joined almost three years ago, which makes the last year, and the few months before it greater. Upon coming to University I joined SWSS (Socialist Worker Student Society). As far as I am aware, they group had not been active for a year or more, or the previous members had all left that year. I was the only student that attended that first meeting. The group slowly grew and diminished, as people became less active, but there was a small, but active group always around. After that first year, the local organiser moved and for the first time just two of us were left to really organise for ourselves. This was all during the now famous protests at Millbank and the height of the student movement of last year. In those few months before Christmas, we made mistakes and we sometimes made the wrong decisions, but we learnt, and ultimately that small group of two grew to a solid 6, with many more students around us. Bear in mind that SWSS was, at the time, the only political group on campus. There was no active Labour Students or Conservative Future. This is a major in the lack of a real political atmosphere on campus. This brings me to the start of the year, where just a small number of student, many of who were newly active, managed have some real solid impact and victories on and off campus.
 
Before I begin, I should explain that students were always involved PACT (Portsmouth Against the Cuts Together) events which I wrote about here, and I mentioned student’s impact in some of them in the article, so I won’t repeat myself but I will go more into students around the strike days.
 
The year kicked with January 29th. We were unable to gain any transport from our student union for the event. This was down to NUS flat-out refusing to support the day and calling for a joint demonstration with the TUC in Manchester, where the then NUS President Aaron Porter was chased off the demonstration by students for being a spineless sell out. Our union had originally booked a coach for Manchester but this was later cancelled as getting up the night before to travel the length of the country was not that appealing. We were right not to build for the Manchester coach because it would have been more effort than it was worth when there was a separate but linked demonstration just an hour or so up the road, but it did leave us in the situation with no real transport to invite other students on.
 
So, the five of us who were in SWSS got the train to London, and for most it was only their second or third big demonstration and the first since being kettled on Westminster Bridge for several hours on December 9th. But the day was great. Seeing over 10,000 students assemble after the defeat on tuition fees and a Christmas break was an inspiration for us to continue the fight, and joining Egyptians at their embassy in support of the revolution there really showed some newer members international solidarity in action and we all came back ready to restart the fight back on campus.
 
But, for the last couple of months of the academic year that fight back did not really happen. With a union unwilling to be political (with two sabbs being an exception) and students still deflated after the defeat over tuition fees not much see a reason to keep fighting, no matter who much the ‘loony’ lefties argued they should.
 
However, we tried to keep the struggle going. We organised a Demonstration shortly after the London demo in January, and for the first time outside of social media we really pushed building it among FE students. We visited a number of local colleges, trying to disguise ourselves as 16 and 17 year-olds as we went about campus distributing leaflets. The weeks before the demonstration was my first serious encounter of police harassment outside a protest. When our Union notified police of the intention to march, the reply they received mentioned myself and another comrade by name and asked if we were involved, saying that we would be held responsible for the actions of those on the demonstration rather than the person who notified the police, and would be arrested should something happen. It didn’t end there. For a week before there was permanently a marked police vehicle outside my flat every day, one day a riot van. Now I could be paranoid, but considering the stories of other activists, and that police officers I had never seen started to address me by name, I think I was justified in my paranoia. In the end, with no real building outside of SWSS the march flopped, but it was still a learning experience for the coming months.
 
April saw the Student Union hold its annual elections to fill sabbatical and Part-Time Officer positions. For the first time in at least two years, SWSS ran two candidates. Becky Gardner for Women’s Officer, and myself for Ethics and Environment. After a week of campaigning, we both won. That may be because we were only running against Re-open Nominations, but I’ll take it as a success nonetheless!
 
 June 30th was the first real big day of strikes that any of us had ever been active in. A few of us were still in Portsmouth for it, but the academic year was over and no other students were! But we still made sure that people saw the few students left in Portsmouth at the 700+ rally.
 
After the Summer break, the lessons of the previous nine months were going to come into good use, as student activists hit the ground running.
 
Shortly before the new academic year officially began, it came to the attention of Becky Gardner, and then, the Student Paper, Pugwash News that pictures of female participants from the Athletic Union’s Naked Calendar had been leaked onto pornographic websites for at least the last three years. What is worse is that the Student Union had known about it, and did not act. You can see my article on the issue at the time here. Now usually, unions do not like to give us much, but the Union, in an attempt to show they are ‘student led’ maybe, decided to call an EGM to debate and vote on the continued existence of the calendar. This was ludicrously named ‘The Naked Debate’. It’s fair to say that no one ever expected us to win the vote to get the calendar banned, neither was it our intention (I would rather the calendar wither and die on its own as students stopped buying it, but one can dream). However, we were determined to fight like we could win. Over two-week before the EGM, thousands of leaflets were handed out on campus, meetings were called by both SWSS and the Union’s Women’s Association to state the case that the sexist calendar should be no more. The athletic Union on the other hand, made videos of Male students getting naked and arguing that the calendar is a great event for charity, although which charity almays seemed to be an afterthought for them.
 
As soon as I entered the room for the debate I knew the result. Around 200 AU members filled the chairs and not many were there to kill the calendar. The debate was a farce. While the  Anti-calendar side debated why it is sexist and why it has no place in the Union. The Pro-side spoke about new ‘safety features’. But there were some revelations at the debate. We found out that the suffragettes burned bras, and that feminists are all about nudity. Needless to say, we did not win the debate, but we sure as hell made a mark on the start of the year.
 
Without much time to rest, October brought the news about cuts to art courses, as well as the closure of three workshops and 17 redundancies. With much haste a protest was organised starting outside the Eldon Building where arts is based. But two days before the demo, Management took the decision to terminate the position of Intern, and graduate Claire Heath. Why? Because she had been the member of staff who took it upon herself to inform students of the cuts and organise a campaign. Disgustingly, upper management are still yet to give her a meeting.
 
 The protest took place on a miserable Wednesday. Around 60 students and lecturers marched to University house where John Craven, the Vice-Chancellor is based. The bottom floor of the building was occupied for over an hour after it became apparent Craven would not come to see us. A march back to Eldon followed where an open canteen meeting was held to discuss the next steps. Students agreed to keep some sort of protest going each Wednesday until circumstances changed.
 
 The following week, around 30 picketed Eldon, stopping students and lecturers and telling them what was going on. Many were shocked to hear of what happened to Claire and activists and the Student Rag made sure the case became a story bigger than Portsmouth. Even former Portsmouth student Grayson Perry spoke out against the University. But as he is only a Turner Prize winner management didn’t care. After all, they are in the business of money.
 
The campaign in Eldon made sure that Portsmouth students had a decent mobilisation for November 9th in London. Without help from the Union, even when democratically mandated to build for it (Remember about being student-led?) a coach was filled. My views on the day are written about here.
 
Back on Campus the campaign against the Naked Calendar was still on going. The Women’s Association attempted to hold a counter-event to the Calendar launch which was being held at the local shit hole, Liquid. However, in order not to upset their top clients, the Union bar refused to hold a Love Music, Hate Sexism gig there.
 
December went by with little activity as people were preoccupied with essays etc, but it drew the end of an active half of the academic year.
 
So where does this leave us in 2012? Well, we know have an inactive, but existing Labour Students. They don’t seem to be a group that will be easy to work with. They are on the right of the Party and argued in favour of cuts in Eldon if it leads to a post-grad common room. We also have a politically inactive, but socially very active Conservative AND Unionist Future. They have aspirations to be more political it seems. They attend Student Council, and seem quite obsessed with what the Left is up to on campus. There is a meeting in the next week with UCU about the cuts at Eldon. We have potential for strike action there, I hope. And we still have to quick to act on all other issues that could crop up on a student level as well as supporting workers and local people in the City, be it against cuts, fascists or whatnot.
 
The last year has been a significant learning curve for a lot of us, and I hope, as it is my last year of my degree, that our hard work will ensure that there is a significant base of activists when some of us leave like there was not when I joined. Whatever happens, you’ll read about it here first.
 
 

4 Comments

Filed under Students, Uncategorized

2011 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 2,600 times in 2011. If it were a cable car, it would take about 43 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

A look back on the past year of activism in Portsmouth: Anti-Cuts

A local cafe shows solidarity with marchers on January 15th

 
I want to try to reflect on the last year in Portsmouth, but I do not aim to go through every event that happened. The last year has been great in Portsmouth and the level of struggle shown is something many have not witnessed locally in years.

I think it would be best to start with the local anti-cuts campaign. PACT (Portsmouth Against the Cuts Together) have been extremely active since its conception at the end of 2010. The year kicked off with a march through town called by PACT on the 15th January. As I wrote at the time, the demo was different from previous anti-cuts demos in Portsmouth. The mood was far angrier than the streets of Portsmouth had seen. The councils had announced just a few days prior that at least 400 jobs would be going. The turn out surprising. Around 500 people from a range of Unions and groups were there, which was bigger than most anticipated and while we didn’t know it then, the turnout was a size of things to come.

Later that month, PACT and Portsmouth Save Our Schools took action in Havant. Tory Minister David Willitts is the local MP and the demo was to lobby him over education cuts. I had a number of criticisms of the demonstration at the time. Firstly, the way the stewards handled the demo left little to be desired. The sheer size of the demo meant it only made sense to take the road, but alas the 200-300 of us stayed on the pavement. There was a small, pre-organised group who were allowed to go in to speak with Willetts. This was mostly a photo opportunity for him, but despite the fact these cuts are hitting women the hardest, not a single woman was in the group. This also led to some mad agreement that meant while they were having tea with the bastard, the rest of the march had to wait 200 yards from the office. The stewarding then went from bad to bizarre as one asked police to arrest a group of university and college students who tried to lead people to get right outside Willetts. What made this more bizarre was the police had originally gone to let us through untill the steward made a scene over it. In the end a small group of around 10, mostly students managed to get down to the office. Willetts came to speak to us after his photo-op, and it is fair to say that the college student on a vocational course and the unemployed mother gave him a far harder time then those inside.

(The Havant demo was a particular highlight for me as I got to tell Willetts that with each cut his party make, the more enemies it creates and we are coming for him. His reply? “We’ll see about that”)

PACT then moved to more localised campaigning with a lobby of the council meeting where the austerity budget was passed at the start of February. Those of us inside had a good laugh when Cllr Vernon-Jackson said, “Capitalism isn’t a nice system…but its the best we have”. PACT produced an alternative budget for the vote, but as expected, not a single councillor voted for it.

Portsmouth also took part in the massive demonstration in London on March 26. There were 15 coaches from Portsmouth, which is massive. I was told it was the biggest amount of coaches filled since the famous Stop the War demo in the 2003.

Last year also saw the first May Day celebrations in the city for some time. Around 150 people took part, finishing in a picnic of Southsea Common. This was also the first time the EDL/fascists (as you can see in the comments of the last link, they deny it was them) tried to oppose the march. They summed a huge two, but their opposition was significant, in that is was a sure sign of the EDL’s move to a classic fascist ideology.

PACT didn’t only hound one minister this year, no, we hounded Vince Cable too (video here) . Around 40 assembled on an early Friday morning to show Vince what we think. After he patronised protesters on Local TV news, he had to leave via the side exit, usually for freight, in order to avoid them.

Following the large Hampshire-wide demonstration on the 25th June, Portsmouth engaged in its first big strike of the year on the 3oth (pictures here). Around 700 people rallied at the end of the day to call for more action.

On November 30th, we finally saw more action. At least 3,000 people rallied in Guildhall square at lunchtime, coming from massive pickets and four feeder marches. The day was a culmination of a year of organising and agitating and has set a mood in Portsmouth that makes 2012 look bright.

To see PACT grow from a weekend march of 500 to taking part in the biggest strike since 1926 in just over a year in phenomenal, and to see that growth on the streets is a fine sight.

It would not be fair to finish this article without mentioning a few other, but equal and significant events over the last year against the cuts.

Portsmouth Sure-Start campaign has been an inspiration for many activists locally. A group of mostly mothers have campaigned tirelessly over the last year out of their own pocket to defend childcare in Hampshire. They had the best speaker on May Day and they have continuously supported PACT and its actions.

Southampton Council workers have rightfully received national attention in their struggle against cuts and job-losses, but as someone in Portsmouth, who visited a Refuse worker picket, to see workers from both cities united is a great thing. As one Binman told me, “Football is football, but against this government we have to be united.”

We also saw some great student-worker solidarity this year, but PACT’s support and publicising of the No to Eldon Cuts campaigns has been great and long may it continue.

Portsmouth and South-Downs Palestine Solidarity Campaign successfully campaigned to get Veolia booted out of operation refuse collection in the City

10 Comments

Filed under Anti-Cuts

Video: #SCAF assualt on Tahrir Square! Solidarity to the Egyptian Revolution!

#FuckSCAF

Leave a Comment

Filed under International, Uncategorized

Fighting sexism is bad for business

Questions are being asked as to why the Waterhole bar rejected an application of a Love Music, Hate Sexism event in Portsmouth Student Union.

The event, which was planned by the UPSU women’s association was to be held as an alternative to the Athletic Union’s Naked Calendar launch party to be held at Liquid, another venue.

However, in an email seen by Lentil Eating Lefty, the bar claimed that the event was anti-Athletic Union and therefore against their main clientele. 

Now, im not one to be shocked by the priorities of business, but isn’t the Union bar for all? Isn’t its main clientele all students regardless of their hobbies and so on?

The planned event will no longer go ahead as planned, and will be organised for the launch of the Zero-tolerance policy that the Union is undertaking.

 

 

1 Comment

Filed under Students

University of Portsmouth confirm art workshop closures and redundancies

In the last few minutes, an email has been sent to Faculty of Creative and Cultural industries students confirming that the Ceramics, Small Metals and Glass workshops are to be closed.

The workshops which are used by many students and have been defended by students, staff and Turner Prize winner Grayson Perry, will be lost alongside 17 members of staff.

11 academic posts and Six technical staff posts are to be replaced by Two academic posts and Four technical posts which will come into effect next August.

The decision was made in an effort to save £526,000 a year in staff costs, to stop the department falling into deficit. However, many students pointed out the hypocrisy that management has just brought a £7million new property for office space.

The email sent to students can be seen below.

To All CCi Students

Over the past four weeks, in accordance with our policy on Organisational Change, Redeployment and Redundancy, we have consulted with individual staff members, trade union representatives, students …and colleagues within the School of Art, Design and Media on a proposal to restructure resources. Due to changes in course provision, and therefore usage requirements, the ceramics and small metals workshops will close from the end of July 2012.

The need to restructure in the School follows decisions made over the past two years to close four courses – BA (Hons) Fine Art, BA (Hons) Three Dimensional Design, ABC Diploma Foundation Studies (Art, Design and Media) and Access to HE Art, Design and Photography and programmes – for various reasons, including falling recruitment and the withdrawal of government funding. At the same time a new programme BA Hons Contemporary Fine Art has been launched in September 2011.

The restructure affects 11 academic posts and 6 technical support posts. Two new academic posts and four technical support posts are being created, to come into effect in August 2012 to teach on the BA Honours Contemporary Fine Art and MA Fine Art courses.

Significant discussion took place during the consultation period and we have listened to the concerns raised by students, staff, ex-staff and ex-students, as well as the general public, and have ensured that as much feedback as possible could be gathered. All the feedback makes a passionate plea not to close these two workshops on the basis that a loss of these facilities will be detrimental to the University’s and City’s arts offer.

Whilst sympathetic to this view point, the Faculty finds that the overall usage statistics of these particular facilities, both retrospective and in the future, given that key users derive from courses that will no longer be running, together with the very high and thus prohibitive cost to run these facilities, lead to the decision to close this provision and invest in the space for other art-making related activities.
As some of you will be aware, similar closures and consolidation of arts based facilities is evident across the Higher Education sector in the UK, as other institutions face up to the same issues.

We recognise, however, that this is a difficult message and outcome for the staff affected directly, and for all staff and students in the School. Those staff involved in the restructure are being supported by Human Resources, senior staff in the Faculty and by the trades unions in reviewing their options.
We also recognise that students have been affected by the sense of upheaval and we would like to thank you all for your understanding and patience during this difficult process. We can assure you all that your courses will continue as planned for the duration of your time here and we will continue at all times to invest in your learning experience.

Simon Claridge

If you would like to raise any concerns about how this may affect your “learning experience”, Faculty Dean Simon Claridge’s email is: simon.claridge@port.ac.uk

*More to be posted when I hear of it

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Update:

Portsmouth Student Union have called an open meeting to discuss the Closures of the CCI workshops and what action should be taken. It will be held on Wednesday 16th November at 6pm in Cafe Coco. Facebook Event here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=286978638008812#!/event.php?eid=318050554877691

Leave a Comment

Filed under Anti-Cuts, Students